Recently, at a book signing or somesuch place (the old Chef wasn’t exactly paying attention), J.K. Rowling (if you don’t know who she is, you must have spent the last several years living under a rock bigger than the Maitre d’s enormous potato-shaped head) announced (without too many parenthetical asides) that the beloved Headmaster of Hogwarts, Albus Dumbledore, is gay. We here at the Buffet are going to leave aside the obvious snide innuendo about Dumbledore’s position with the school and be mature (for us, anyway). We will simply note that this is, to the world at large, no big deal. The irrational fundawhacko crowd has already burned every copy of the Harry Potter series within easy reach because of the fact that the books teach our children dark secrets like friendship, courage, and imagination (or maybe it was witchcraftââ¬Â¦I always do forget what the Robertson/Falwell/Chick crowd gets so upset about), so it is unlikely that they can get any more fervidly opposed to anything that mad English woman writes. Exactly what effect this low-megaton bombshell will have on Rowling’s fan community is unclear, although it’s certain to throw the Harry/Snape slashfic writers for a loop or three.
As said before, the religious fundamentalist crowd has already denounced the Potter books as being wicked and vile, and can hardly do more than add another bullet point to their list of reasons the series should be banned from school libraries across the Bible Belt. “Oh, yeah, in addition to all this black magic and Satan worship, it encourages homosexuality! We always knew those wuz linked!” Their reaction is going to be predictable and monotonous.
The Chef, however, just wonders why Dumbledore’s leanings matter at all. Granted, I always figured that the old boy and Ms. McGonagal had something more than a mutual respect between then, and assumed that Albus and Minerva were knocking boots behind the scenes. But that’s most likely just the Chef’s own flaming heterosexuality making him see things that aren’t there. That, or perhaps she was just his beard, because the Malfoys and their crowd are homophobic (they used every other excuse they could find to get him fired, so why not add charges of bumping uglies with other men?). Before this turns into a serious discussion of the Potter literature, the Chef will steer this boat back to other, more treacherous waters.
You see, when homosexual characters show up on TV or in mainstream books, they tend to be little more than flaming stereotypes. The few who aren’t are usually, well, boring. I have no idea why that is, except to guess that the writers were so busy trying not to write a stereotypically “gay” character that they forgot to put anything resembling life into said character. Dumbledore, however, is neither a flaming stereotype (at least, that we know of – it’s possible he could have been sneaking out at night to go see the drag shows at a little dive called the Man Hole in Hogsmeade), nor is he boring (for the most part). While he sometimes comes off as a bit of a walking copyright infringement on Gandalf’s territory, Albus is an interesting character with a rich past and a defined personality. In the shadow of those, his sexual leanings are beneath notice.
I can hear the reaction from some readers now: “Beneath notice? But Chef, if someone’s gay, that’s a part of their personality and should be taken seriously!” In reality, one’s sex drive and relationships, no matter which team you bat for, define part of one’s life (not all of it, despite what the esteemed Herr Freud would say). In case you didn’t notice, the Potter books aren’t the really-real world (and if you think they are, you’re probably in the fundamentalist crowd who believe that the books contain true black magic spells – and the Chef for one is disappointed, as he was looking forward to learning the Cruciatus Curse). They’re fiction, and heroic fiction at that. And from the standpoint of heroic fiction, Dumbledore’s sexual preferences don’t matter much.
Dumbledore fills what we in the literary business call the role of the mentor. Like his counterparts Obi-Wan Kenobi, Gandalf, Hudson, and Morpheus, old Albus exists in the story to teach and protect the young hero (that would be Harry) so that when the time comes he’ll be ready to defeat the villain. Most of the time, the mentor character doesn’t get a love interest (Morpheus and Niobe in the Matrix movies notwithstanding – but by the time that one happened, Morpheus had become more of a sidekick or backup hero instead of a mentor), since their primary role in the story focuses on their (99% of the time) platonic relationship with the up-and-coming young hero. In short, most of the time, a mentor may as well be a eunuch as far as the story is concerned (lovely singing voice, though). This was probably the reason that the Obi-Wan/Anakin/Padme love triangle in the early drafts of the Star Wars prequels was dropped – it takes the focus off of the relationship between mentor and ward.
In the end, this revelation is an interesting tidbit that adds realism and diversity to the Potter world, but in a literary sense has no impact on the character or story. So why would Rowling even mention it?
Simple. She was asked, and answered.
She wasn’t asked specifically if Dumbledore might enjoy getting it on with sweaty men, but Rowling was given the question of whether or not Albus might have had feelings for another (female) character. After answering no, she went on to explain why that was, and got a favorable reaction from that crowd. Fine and dandy, but some people might ask why she had to even go on to mention it.
My guess is that the Potterverse may not be wrapped up as we thought. Rowling has already announced an encyclopedia of the series that will explain much of the background information, her thought processes, and additional material that didn’t make it into the books. Whether or not she’ll include sexual preferences in each characters’ entries is obviously up in the air, but I doubt that will be it. Rowling may well have in mind a prequel series chronicling the adventures of a young Dumbledore and his boyfriend (or partner, if you prefer – personally, the Chef has always thought the politically-correct terminology sounded too cold and sterile). Only time will tell.
For now, though, the reaction from most people isââ¬Â¦ambivalence?